Re: shared memory problem on armel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:33:54PM +0100, martinwguy wrote:
> There is a way: for Debian armhf to re-target on v6 in a future release.
> That would break none of the existing installations and make Debian
> more Universal as per its manifesto. With hindsight it would have been
> better for Debian armhf to have targetted on the lowest arch version
> that almost always had a VFP unit, but that forward path is easy.
thumb2 support saves memory and cache especially. That I believe was
the main reason to pick v7 over v6.
> It seems a net win compared to a few % extra speed in FPU-intensive
> apps on v7+ CPUs.
--
Len Sorensen
Reply to: