Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
> (*1) and if someone _really_ wants a debug build of that particular
> problematic package, on a build and distro port that's still
> experimental, well, surely they can compile it themselves, using their
> own resources, yes?
Neither wheezy nor the armhf port contained in it are experimental. If
that's not what you meant, please be clearer.