Re: Raising severity for armhf bugs
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2011, 19:03:39 schrieb Rick Thomas:
> Cool!
>
> Does there exist an inexpensive self-contained armhf box that folks
> can use for development and experimentation? Something like the
> Sheeva Plug for armel?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
Both the Beagle-(OMAP3) and the PandaBoard(OMAP4) are suitable targets.
It is not completely selfcontained, you might need a case and a PowerSupply as
well, otherwise they compare pretty good to the idea of the sheevaplug.
Cheers,
Karsten
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> > As mentioned in [1], since squeeze is released, we intend to push on
> > our goal
> > to get armhf into the next Debian release. Most bugs have been
> > filed, and the
> > next step is to raise severity from 'wishlist' to 'important'. We
> > will allow a
> > period of 1 week for the bugs to be fixed before we do NMUs, as most
> > of the
> > bugs are really simple. In a few days we will have a Debian Sprint in
> > Cambridge,UK [2], where we provide NMUs for the unfixed packages.
> > Also, in the
> > following days, an official request to add armhf as a release goal
> > for wheezy
> > will be made -as a bug against release.d.o.
> >
> > Konstantinos Margaritis
> > armhf port maintainer
> >
> > [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2011/02/msg00022.html
> > [2]: http://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2011/EmdebianSprint
Reply to: