Building Polyorb on armel port
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
At lab we get our hand on two OpenRD-Ultimate boxes. One is dedicated to
software development and so I trying to build all the packages I need
for our acquisition system. xmlada, libaws and libtemplates-parser build
without problems using apt-source. But for polyorb using
org,debian.polyorb ad10ed273834a7786a205723f3819b586abfd202 I hit this :
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_create'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_key_create'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_attr_setstacksize'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_kill'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_sigmask'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_setspecific'
/home/xavier/debian/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/libpolyorb-giop.so:
undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_init'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Does anybody knowns/has an idea why this library is missing for this
arch and not the others ? I have done exactly the same on an amd64
distribution and the package builds perfectly.
As soon as I build the package under armel I'll be able to add it to the
arch list and go further to have our acquisition system embedded in the
next electronic board we are building at lab.
Thanks in advance, xavier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0trcYACgkQVIZi0A5BZF6oWQCeNvThg39ls75BMs7NXM95rh+K
VsoAn33dIA9LSkUG239LR9HikjMGVqfQ
=+abe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: