On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:44:17 +0200 Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Martin, > > 2010/7/15, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>: > > * Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com> [2010-07-14 22:54]: > >> I would recommend you tag the bug as 'wontfix', as Debian does not > >> fix stable release, but only provides security updates on the > >> stable release. > > > > That's not true. We can fix critical issues in stable too. > > Thanks for clarifying. > > But I think, and you probably agree with me, that user reporting the > bug should try to move to 'armel' instead of trying to fix a bug (on a > deprecated architecture) which upstream has not bother to fix > themselves. Well, IMHO the problem here is different because of the followings: - we have an unspecified number of broken packages in the stable release on a particular architecture; - while the next stable release won't support such arch, we are still providing support for lenny. Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature