Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
Loïc Minier a écrit :
> In fact, I chatted with a couple of people about this port, with the
> proposal that we should have an ad hoc BoF at Debconf to chose a good
> name.
>
> During these chats, I heard other suggestions around a new port
> notably, optimizing for much more recent CPUs such as armv7+. Ubuntu
> did see quite a difference by moving all the way up to armv7 + thumb-2.
>
> Some technical issues to be aware of:
> * hard float needs gcc 4.5 or a bunch of patches from 4.4; CodeSourcery
> GCC 4.4 (and hopefully soon Linaro GCC 4.4) has these
> * hard float is quite a win on Cortex A8, but might be much less so
> on A9 -- I think on the long term we want hard float support in a
> port
> * there's the question of which vfp version we turn on, vfpv3 is not
> supported on all armv7 SoCs (e.g. Marvell's Dove only supports
> vfpv3-d16)
> * some libraries need porting to hard-float, such as libffi and others
>
One more technical issue, though not directly related to ARM: we need to
upgrade the hard drives on the debian-ports.org machine before accepting
a new port. Nothing hudge, but that may introduce a bit of delay.
Alternatively we can move one port (SH4 ?) to the official Debian
archive ;-)
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: