Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
From: Sujit Karataparambil <sjt.kar@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:47:26 +0530
Message-id: <921ca19c0906290117n3abf0445q399f353b28e51846@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20090629074159.GD6014@debian64.potato.lan>
References: <20090619065350.GA6198@debian64.potato.lan> <20090624153319.GF2437@deprecation.cyrius.com> <804dabb00906271907m1f639cc6jc9fb4eacf5682f7c@mail.gmail.com> <20090628102320.GC5934@debian64.potato.lan> <20090629074159.GD6014@debian64.potato.lan>

More specific to 3.18.6.
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/rsyslog

> | Jun 29 06:25:27 slug kernel: imklog 3.18.6, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
> | Jun 29 06:25:27 slug rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="3.18.6"
> |                      x-pid="1569" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] restart
> | Jun 29 06:26:10 slug kernel: [43033504.850000] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100

I am not an tasklet expert. But this does not go away when nohz=off.
Or is it not desirable.


-- 
-- Sujit K M

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Stefan Luetje <stefan.luetje@t-online.de>

References:
- [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Stefan Luetje <stefan.luetje@t-online.de>
- Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com>
- Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Stefan Luetje <stefan.luetje@t-online.de>
- Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
  - From: Stefan Luetje <stefan.luetje@t-online.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
Next by Date: Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
Previous by thread: Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
Next by thread: Re: [NSLU2] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread