Re: arm vs armel

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: arm vs armel
From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:45:22 +0000
Message-id: <20090211104522.GF31602@knossos.aleph1.co.uk>
Mail-followup-to: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <4992A6A4.4090501@tecnequip.com.br>
References: <4992A6A4.4090501@tecnequip.com.br>

+++ Marcelo Utikawa da Fonseca [2009-02-11 08:21 -0200]:
> Hi all!
> 
> I saw in the Debian ARM port page (http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/) 
> that arm will be discontinued in favor of the armel.
> Currently I am using Debian Lenny and arm architecture.
> Is it recommended to switch to armel version?

Unless you are using strongarm hardware (which you aren't), then, yes
- armel is better in all important ways, and in the future will be the
only option.

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Balloonz - Toby Churchill - Aleph One - Debian
http://wookware.org/

Reply to:

References:
- arm vs armel
  - From: Marcelo Utikawa da Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@tecnequip.com.br>

Prev by Date: arm vs armel
Next by Date: Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage
Previous by thread: arm vs armel
Next by thread: ARM listed as supported in Lenny
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread