Re: Progress on Bug#444271 / N2100 disk performance
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes:
Hi,
> * Markus Lindenberg <markus.lindenberg@gmail.com> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
>> i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
>> limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
>> core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even my
>> slug seems to have a better disk performance.
>
> No news I'm afraid. The patches appear to be stable now but have not
> received any comments from the wider kernel.org community, so I'm
> reluctant to put them into the Debian package.
>
> What is needed is an experienced developer who can take a look at the
> patches and push for upstream inclusion. Arnaud, did you have a
> chance to look at the patches recently?
I must admit that last time I looked at them was when the patches were sent
to l-a-k [1] but I plan to have a look at them
Note also that they're not exactly the same version as the one available
on sourceforge so some newer version exists somewhere.
As some issues were raised, I'm not sure it's ready to be merged in the
Debian kernel. Nevertheless, one can still use them on their own kernel
and report bugs :)
Arnaud
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=120493107523366&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=120516121532622&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=120516134500498&w=2
Reply to: