Re: leisner: rm assertion on arm
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:59:50PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >in the sid chroot on leisner this can be observed:
> >rm: rm.c:371: main: Assertion `((status) == RM_OK || (status) ==
> >RM_USER_DECLINED || (status) == RM_ERROR)' failed.
> >Do we have a guess whether this is hardware, kernel, or coreutils
> >related? (anybody else seeing this?)
New version of coreutils uses unlinkat instead of unlink as previously.
-unlink("tests") = -1 EISDIR (Is a directory)
-open(".", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
-lstat64("tests", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
-chdir("tests") = 0
-lstat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
-open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|0x80000) = 4
-fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
-fcntl64(4, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC)
-getdents64(4, /* 2 entries */, 4096) = 48
-getdents64(4, /* 0 entries */, 4096) = 0
-close(4) = 0
-fchdir(3) = 0
-rmdir("tests") = 0
+lstat64("/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
+SYS_327(0xffffff9c, 0xbeed8f06, 0xbeed8c50, 0x100, 0xbeed8f06) = 0
+SYS_328(0xffffff9c, 0xbeed8f06, 0, 0, 0x40148000) = -1 EISDIR (Is a directory)
+SYS_322(0xffffff9c, 0xbeed8f06, 0x28900, 0, 0x40148000) = 3
+fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
+fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
+fcntl64(3, F_GETFL) = 0x28800 (flags O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_NOFOLLOW)
+fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
+getdents64(3, /* 2 entries */, 4096) = 48
+getdents64(3, /* 0 entries */, 4096) = 0
+fcntl64(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC)
close(3) = 0
+SYS_328(0xffffff9c, 0x1d1a8, 0x200, 0, 0x40148000) = 0
+write(2, "rm: rm.c:371: main: Assertion `("..., 116) = 116
SYS_328 = unlinkat
rm seems works as expected, after unlinkat fails, unlinkat is called with
AT_REMOVEDIR, and directory gets removed and RM_OK is returned. Why rm
decides to assert anyway is complete mystery to me. Reassign to
coreutils?
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Reply to: