On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:48:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Note that we don't intend to include arm in lenny+1 and would like to > have a clear commitment from the arm/armel pointers to switch to only > armel (no arm anymore) after lenny. Armel is already where most of the work is done, and already at last debconf we agreed that the best way to proceed would be to release lenny with arm + armel and the drop arm. So, yes, we can commit to that[1]. If there is still oldabi arm user demand, we can support them using the debian-ports infrastructure with relatively little effort. > IRC discussion with tbm showed that lenny should include both arm and > armel to give people a chance to switch from a supported arm to a > supported armel This is currently in the hands of ftp-masters, and Anthony Towns has already agreed to add armel to the archive. Which, I think is totally awesome :) Cheers, Riku [1] I can ofcourse only speak of myself, but AFAIK other porters agree. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature