Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:25:48 +0300
Message-id: <20070519082548.GA25213@kos.to>
In-reply-to: <20070518222115.GD22903@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <20070518143038.s2dm5gqp5wgg8g4o@webmail.manchester.ac.uk> <17997.44688.706410.700446@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20070518143638.GC31968@xi.wantstofly.org> <464DBD65.7040705@billgatliff.com> <20070518160019.GD31968@xi.wantstofly.org> <464DDD72.80504@billgatliff.com> <20070518210833.GA30184@kos.to> <20070518222115.GD22903@deprecation.cyrius.com>

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:21:15AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> [2007-05-19 00:08]:
> > Well, for example the toolchain issues (fortran, java) are still in the

> The fortran bootstrap error got fixed in gcc SVN a few days ago.

This time, it feels nice I was wrong.

-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure
  - From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
- Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure
  - From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
- Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure
  - From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
- What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
  - From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
- Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
- Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
Next by Date: Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
Previous by thread: Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
Next by thread: Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread