On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > I'd rather that than have to remember that "armeb" is EABI, while "arm" > isn't; "armel" is, but ... > > Does anyone have any expectation that sarge-built applications will run > without recompilation on etch? I certainly expect that. Len Sorensen