Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:10:26 +0000
Message-id: <56d259a00603120410k33e86d14p2528dc783fb0165@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <26f7add21636703a65af309a9b599045@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
References: <26f7add21636703a65af309a9b599045@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>

Any site that counts 224 users of '86 Debian in the world, and 29 for
ARM is obviously a joke.
buildd.net is not under the Debian domain, and the fact that it
collects email addresses is suspect. Caveat emptor.

    M

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
  - From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>

References:
- ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
  - From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>

Prev by Date: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
Next by Date: Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
Previous by thread: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
Next by thread: Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread