Re: getting packages to rebuild
> > * On all three packages, the arm build failed because of an
> > unsatisfiable build dependency that was the result of a timing
> > problem. These should succeed now as the problem with the
> > dependent package has been cleared. I emailed
> > email@example.com to request these to be rebuilt. Is there
> In this case you don't have to do anything about arm for your package:
> arm: libs/xerces25_2.5.0-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [extra:out-of-date]
> Dependencies: libicu28-dev
> Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 17 20:04:28
Okay, thanks. I had been looking at build logs and saw the maybe-failed
but I didn't check the status. (I didn't know about this, though I
had a bookmark to buildd.debian.net. Oops.)
> arm: libs/icu28_2.8-3: Building by buildd_arm-netwinder [optional:uncompiled]
> Previous state was Needs-Build until 2004 Jun 13 02:33:44
> You might want to check this out. It certainly isn't still
> building. Did it fail? Should it be retried? Does it need bugsfixes?
> Check for buildd logs and bugreports.
Yes, it seems the most recent arm build failed, but yet the current
icu28 (2.8-3) is in testing. Perhaps someone built it manually.
There are no bugs posted again icu28.
> Check buildd.net:
> arm: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [extra:out-of-date]
> mips: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date]
> mipsel: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Installed by rmurray-repeat [extra:out-of-date]
> Those two puzzle me. Why does mipsel build on mipsel and every other
> arch but is not-for-us on mips? Unless you have a good reason not to
> support mips please mention that to our leader too.
Hmm.... what does Not-For-Us mean? My packages all had either
Architecture: any or Architecture: all, so I don't see why this would
> alpha: libs/xerces24_2.4.0-2: Needs-Build [extra:out-of-date]
> Not a big surprise there, just wait or fiond someone with an alpha to
> build it manually.
Is this just not a big surprise because of the much-discussed long
> mips, mipsel, powerpc: libs/xerces24_2.4.0-2: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date]
> Why do you support even less archs?
I'd like to know that too. I don't think it's anything I did. How
would I find out?
Thanks for your helpful and thorough response.