[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: other failed packages



In message <E14WI0I-0007Re-00@pig.labs.futuretv.com>
          Philip Blundell <pb@futuretv.com> wrote:

>
> interpreters/clisp_2000-03-06-2 by buildd [optional:uncompiled]   
>   Reasons for failing:
>     [Category: none]
>     needs ARM port?
>     .


Odd.  A RISC OS port has existed for many years - this doesn't imply
automatically working in ARM Linux of course, but any ARM specific stuff
should hopefully be there.


>     gcc -O -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -fomit
> -frame-pointer -Wno-sign-compare -O2 -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -c spvw.c
>     In file included from spvw.d:21:
>     lispbibl.d:1409: #error "Preferred integer sizes depend on CPU -- Gren intBW
> size, intWLsize, intBWLsize neu einstellen!"
>     lispbibl.d:1583: #error "Preferred digit size depends on CPU -- Gre intDsize
>  neu einstellen!"
>     make[1]: *** [spvw.o] Error 1
>     make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/buildd/build/clisp-2000-03-06/src'
>     make[1]: Entering directory `/home/buildd/build/clisp-2000-03-06/src'
>     gcc -O -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -fomit
> -frame-pointer -Wno-sign-compare -O2 -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -c spvw.c
>     In file included from spvw.d:21:
>     lispbibl.d:1409: #error "Preferred integer sizes depend on CPU -- Gren intBW
> size, intWLsize, intBWLsize neu einstellen!"
>     lispbibl.d:1583: #error "Preferred digit size depends on CPU -- Gre intDsize
>  neu einstellen!"
>     make[1]: *** [spvw.o] Error 1
>     make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/buildd/build/clisp-2000-03-06/src'
>     make: *** [build-clisp] Error 2 


Peter

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Peter Naulls - peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk
 Homepage - http://free.prohosting.com/~chocky/
 Java for RISC OS and ARM - http://www.java.riscos.org.uk/
 Debian Linux on RiscPCs - http://www.erble.freeserve.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: