[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BUG: gcc broken



In message <709336484a%peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk>
          Peter Naulls <peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> > > > cc: Internal compiler error: program cpp0 got fatal signal 11
> > > > 
> > > > gcc  2.95.3-4, running unstable
> > 
> > On what sort of machine? With what CPU? [and of what age?]
> > Running
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo
> 
> I'm now seeing this, just to compound all my other build issues.
> 
> revision 2's K, isn't it?   I can probably swap my SAs over:
> 
> Processor       : Intel StrongARM-110 rev 2 (v4l)
> BogoMIPS        : 190.46
> Hardware        : Acorn-RiscPC
> Revision        : 0000
> Serial          : 0000000000000000

Right, I now have a working 2.4 kernel (having compiled it on an older
2.4 test kernel) and the compiler does work now.  Whether that's a
consequence of being built on 2.4 or something new in GCC that relies on
2.4 behaviour, I don't know.  (I haven't built 2.2.18 yet, but I will
check on that).

Futher to this, the latest inetd fails to work on 2.2 (again I need to
check on 2.2.18).  It reports:  'getrlimit: Function not implemented'
when it starts up.

Peter


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Peter Naulls - peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk
 Homepage - http://free.prohosting.com/~chocky/
 Java for RISC OS and ARM - http://www.java.riscos.org.uk/
 Debian Linux on RiscPCs - http://www.erble.freeserve.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: