[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ARM release status



Back in December bdale suggested this criteria for ARM release,
henceforth known as the 'bdale release metric' or BRM.

> I personally believe that if every package of priority standard or higher in
> main is up to date (less those not relevant to the architecture, of course), 
> then we can/should release.

We will also need boot-floppies to do initial installs.  boot-floppies
2.2.7 was sort of usable.  I'm building 2.2.8 today, we'll see.

Here is an up to date BRM chart.

12/25 12/28 12/29 12/30 12/31 01/11 03/16
  32    22     1     0     0     5     0  required:out-of-date
   5     5     5     5     5     5     3  required:uncompiled

  12    10     0     0     0     2     0  important:out-of-date
   3     3     1     1     1     1     0  important:uncompiled

  26    23     1     0     0     3     1  standard:out-of-date
  15    14    13     3     3     6     5  standard:uncompiled

 454   430   430   260   159    82    33  optional:out-of-date
 801   800   798   795   795   353   190  optional:uncompiled

  93    92    92    91    91    16     4  extra:out-of-date
 175   174   174   173   173    80    42  extra:uncompiled

Of the unbuilt or out of date BRM candidate packages we have...

[required:uncompiled] ld.so  <-- quinn-diff says no, I say yes
[required:uncompiled] glibc  <-- quinn-diff says no, I say yes
[required:uncompiled] amiga-fdisk-bf  <-- m68k,ppc only

[standard:out-of-date] tetex-bin  <-- normal churn, will be built soon

[standard:uncompiled] tetex-base  <-- quinn-diff says no, I say yes
[standard:uncompiled] gpm  <-- quinn-diff says no, I say yes
[standard:uncompiled] gdbm  <-- old aout version
[standard:uncompiled] gdb
[standard:uncompiled] zlib  <-- old aout version 

Which leaves us with just one non-BRM-compliant package.
I will take a shot at making a gdb-arm today after the boot floppies.

WHAT WE STILL NEED
------------------
We need a crypto legal developer to build and upload the non-us
packages.  I can't do those.  (at the very least pgp, gpg, ssh)

We need someone with a RiscPC to make a rescue disk of some sort.
The generated boot floppies are probably close, but that first thing
that loads a kernel and root needs doing.

This weekend may be a good weekend to try some test installs.

-- 
                                     Jim Studt, President
                                     The Federated Software Group, Inc.


Reply to: