Re: canl-c/gridsite: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On 2016-12-03 12:14:38 [+0100], Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Friday, 2 December 2016 00:16:24 CET Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > is there a reason for gridsite not to go for 3.0 (or backport the
> > change) and libssl-dev? Apache stays 1.0 but does not expose anything
> > SSL related (unless I read #828236 too quick).
> (assuming you meant 1.1 instead of 3.0). Unfortunately, gridsites uses apache
> private structures to get to the SSL related stuff and then uses openssl
> functions on it. So gridsite absolutely must use the same openssl version as
I read somewhere that gridsite 3.0 supports openssl 1.1.0. And I read in
the apache bug that they no longer depend on openssl headers in their
apache dev headers. I had no idea, that apache exposes the SSL struct to
their users. Since gridsite depends on curl as well, I am going to chec
the curl usage is safe in reard to 1.1.0…
Thanks for the info.