[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#779222: marked as done (apr-util: please make the build reproducible)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:24:09 +0100
with message-id <54F72399.8030908@gmail.com>
and subject line alsaplayer, apr-util, aroarfw and assimp are now reproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #779222,
regarding apr-util: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

779222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apr-util
Version: 1.5.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps


While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that apr-util could not be built reproducibly.

The attached patch removes extra timestamps in the doxygen documentation from
the build system. Once applied, apr-util can be built reproducibly in our
current experimental framework.

Thanks, akira

 [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
--- apr-util-1.5.4.orig/docs/doxygen.conf
+++ apr-util-1.5.4/docs/doxygen.conf
@@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ CASE_SENSE_NAMES=NO

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- The bug-reports filed against these packages should be closed because patching doxygen to have NO as the default value for the variable HTML_TIMESTAMP fixes the problem reported for these packages.

If you want to understand the problem that led to this confusion it is explained in this email:


Cheers, akira

--- End Message ---

Reply to: