[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#721272: marked as done (apache2: logrotate script should not call /etc/init.d/apache2 directly)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:22:12 +0000
with message-id <54458B14.1040207@nirgal.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#721272: apache2: logrotate script should not call /etc/init.d/apache2 directly
has caused the Debian Bug report #721272,
regarding apache2: logrotate script should not call /etc/init.d/apache2 directly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
721272: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721272
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.6-3
Severity: minor

This is almost all in the subject.

I think invoke-rc.d would make sure local policy is properly enforced.

The culprit is in source file debian/apache2.logrotate



-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apache2 depends on:
ii  apache2-bin   2.4.6-3
ii  apache2-data  2.4.6-3
ii  lsb-base      4.1+Debian12
ii  mime-support  3.54
ii  perl          5.14.2-21
ii  procps        1:3.3.4-2

Versions of packages apache2 recommends:
ii  ssl-cert  1.0.33

Versions of packages apache2 suggests:
pn  apache2-doc                                      <none>
pn  apache2-suexec-pristine | apache2-suexec-custom  <none>
pn  apache2-utils                                    <none>
ii  iceweasel [www-browser]                          17.0.8esr-2
ii  w3m [www-browser]                                0.5.3-11

Versions of packages apache2-bin depends on:
ii  libapr1                  1.4.8-1
ii  libaprutil1              1.5.2-1
ii  libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite3  1.5.2-1
ii  libaprutil1-ldap         1.5.2-1
ii  libc6                    2.17-92
ii  libcap2                  1:2.22-1.2
ii  libldap-2.4-2            2.4.31-1+nmu2
ii  liblua5.1-0              5.1.5-5
ii  libpcre3                 1:8.31-2
ii  libssl1.0.0              1.0.1e-3
ii  libxml2                  2.9.1+dfsg1-3
ii  perl                     5.14.2-21
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

Versions of packages apache2-bin suggests:
pn  apache2-doc                                      <none>
pn  apache2-suexec-pristine | apache2-suexec-custom  <none>
ii  iceweasel [www-browser]                          17.0.8esr-2
ii  w3m [www-browser]                                0.5.3-11

Versions of packages apache2 is related to:
ii  apache2      2.4.6-3
ii  apache2-bin  2.4.6-3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> I think invoke-rc.d would make sure local policy is properly
>> enforced.
>>
>> The culprit is in source file debian/apache2.logrotate
> 
> Why is this a problem? If apache2 is running (and the pid file is in 
> the expected place), a reload will be triggered. Otherwise, nothing is 
> done.

Hello

I think there was some policy about the fact a script should not call
/etc/init.d/ directly but rather call invoke-rc.d, though I cannot
remember where I got that tough.

Now, with all the changes in start scripts, I'm totally lost, and I'm
not sure this is such a good idea. If init.d/ works with logrotate when
a "policy" prevented apache to start, then there is no problem indeed.

So I'm taking the liberty to close that bug I reported. My apologies for
the noise. ^^

-- Nirgal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: