Hi, On 04.06.2013 23:39, Josh Triplett wrote: > (I debated whether to open this as grave or just important, but I don't > think the new transitional package should transition to testing with > this bug present.) It won't do so anyway. We prefer a coordinated rush together with our reverse dependencies. See #707024. I don't think this is grave, to be honest. > The apache2.2-bin package formerly supplied only the binaries for the > Apache web server, and notably did *not* run a systemwide apache daemon. > However, the new apache2.2-bin transitional package depends on both > apache2-bin (the equivalent binaries-only package) and apache2 (the > system daemon package). Please don't do that; that will cause systems > with only apache2.2-bin installed to suddenly end up with a running > system web server after upgrade. Yes, you raise a valid point. However, I'm pretty sure we did this on purpose back then. Sadly I don't remember details anymore as this transition was originally meant to happen for Wheezy. I think this was somehow related to the MPM packages disappearing. I am going to test this again and let you know. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature