tags 682401 + pending thanks Hi, On 22.07.2012 22:22, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > AFAICS, dbmmanage has not seen a single code commit upstream since the > C variant, htdbm, has been introduced in 2001. Maybe we should get rid > of dbmmanage in the 2.4 packages. But unbreaking it for wheezy by > using Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1 is still a good idea. Done both. I committed rab80d43 which I want to get into Testing (waiting a bit for you to comment before uploading, however) and r28a921f for 2.4 which drops the tool entirely. > Digest::MD5 seems to be part of the "perl" package in wheezy, too. No > recommends needed. Digest::MD5 is, but dbmmanage uses Crypt::PasswdMD5 which is not API-compatible to Digest::MD5. That needs (a bit) more work to get it running in the perl base distribution. Thus, users of MD5 will get a warning to install the appropriate modules. I improved the message though, so that the Debian package name is told. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature