[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688024: marked as done (apache2-mpm-worker & proxy_ajp - too many "W" Sending Reply" threads)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:52:05 +0200
with message-id <505B3BA5.5060609@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688024: Acknowledgement (apache2-mpm-worker & proxy_ajp - too many "W" Sending Reply" threads)
has caused the Debian Bug report #688024,
regarding apache2-mpm-worker & proxy_ajp - too many "W" Sending Reply" threads
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apache2.2-bin
Version: 2.2.16-6+squeeze7
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze

Hi.

I use Apache HTTPD server in front of Apache Tomcat with proxy_ajp.
Recently I added mod evasive to prevent DoS attack and blockinig sources of that attack 
with iptables with following configuration:

<IfModule mod_evasive20.c> 
    DOSHashTableSize    3097 
    DOSPageCount        5 
    DOSSiteCount        500 
    DOSPageInterval     1 
    DOSSiteInterval     1 
    DOSBlockingPeriod   10
    DOSSystemCommand    "sudo /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -s %s -j DROP"
</IfModule>

After that I noticed that apache server has a lot of "W" Sending Reply" threads (on mod status) and 
these threads tried to serve requests from blocked IP addresses.
I tried to reproduce this problem on Wheezy (Apache 2.2.22), but there the problem seems solved.
Could you fix this problem for Squeezy too ?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apache2.2-bin depends on:
ii  libapr1                1.4.2-6+squeeze4  The Apache Portable Runtime Librar
ii  libaprutil1            1.3.9+dfsg-5      The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite 1.3.9+dfsg-5      The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libaprutil1-ldap       1.3.9+dfsg-5      The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libc6                  2.11.3-3          Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcap2                1:2.19-3          support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libldap-2.4-2          2.4.23-7.2        OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpcre3               8.02-1.1          Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libssl0.9.8            0.9.8o-4squeeze13 SSL shared libraries
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3  compression library - runtime

apache2.2-bin recommends no packages.

apache2.2-bin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Georgi,

On 20.09.2012 17:03, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> It's a bug in sudo package.
> Close the bug report, please.

thanks for triaging this issue yourself. Closing the bug as requested,
please note you could so yourself [1].

[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing

-- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: