[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284115: marked as done (mod_bandwidth breaks resumes/concurrent downloads)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:30:39 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100324203039.BC4B0311F@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package apache-common has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #284115,
regarding mod_bandwidth breaks resumes/concurrent downloads
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
284115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apache-common
Version: 1.3.33-2
Severity: normal


mod_bandwidth in debian is in version 2.0 (I think).
There exist version 2.0.6. It can be taken from
http://www.cohprog.com/mod_bandwidth.html -> Download -> FTP
(main site lists 2.0.4 as newest, Download section 2.0.5 and source says
2.0.6 :)).

Changelog against source in debian says:
10/14/00 - Minor bug fixed
12/15/00 - Bug fix when using mmap
08/29/01 - Add a directive to change the data directory
           (Thanks to Awesome Walrus <walrus@amur.ru>)
01/12/03 - Add MaxConnection directive to limit the number
           of simultaneous connections.

The 08/29/01 change adds BandWidthDataDir that could be used to add
default directory path instead of current source patch approach.

Also currently there is no documentation for this module in debian.
People looking for docs go to the www site and are misleaded about
configuration options. 


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-ow1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages apache-common depends on:
ii  apache-utils           1.3.33-2          Utility programs for webservers
ii  debconf                1.4.30.10         Debian configuration management sy
ii  elinks [www-browser]   0.9.1+0.9.2pre4-1 Character mode WWW/FTP browser
ii  libc6                  2.3.2.ds1-18      GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2               4.2.52-17         Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1              1.95.8-1          XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  links [www-browser]    0.99-1.2          Character mode WWW browser
ii  lynx [www-browser]     2.8.5-2           Text-mode WWW Browser
ii  mime-support           3.28-1            MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                   5.8.4-3           Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  sed                    4.1.2-1           The GNU sed stream editor
ii  ucf                    1.13              Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information:
  apache-common/confignotes:
  apache-common/old-logrotate-exists:
  apache-common/logs:
  apache-shared/debconf-modules: mod_userdir, mod_status, mod_setenvif, mod_negotiation, mod_mime_magic, mod_mime, mod_log_config, mod_dir, mod_autoindex, mod_auth, mod_alias, mod_access, mod_php4
  apache-shared/restart: true

-- 
Piotrek
irc: #debian.pl
Mors Drosophilis melanogastribus!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.3.34-4.1+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/284115 in Debian BTS
against the package apache-common. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/418266. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: