[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605081: marked as done (ssl-cert depends mktemp, however it's not marked in dependence)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:35:17 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012121430010.8093@eru.sfritsch.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#605081: ssl-cert depends mktemp, however it's not marked in dependence
has caused the Debian Bug report #605081,
regarding ssl-cert depends mktemp, however it's not marked in dependence
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605081: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ssl-cert
  Version: 1.0.27
when I install ssl-cert, the post install script report /bin/mktemp not exist.
find out it's been used in make-ssl-cert
 
I suggest add mktemp as dependence

 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, zhiqiang wang wrote:


Package: ssl-cert
 Version: 1.0.27
when I install ssl-cert, the post install script report /bin/mktemp not
exist.
find out it's been used in make-ssl-cert

I suggest add mktemp as dependence
mktemp has been essential: yes since etch, i.e. no dependency should be needed. I don't know how you ended up whithout mktemp installed, but this would probably be a bug in apt.
In the mean-time, mktemp has been moved into the coreutils package, which is also essential. So there is no need for an explicit dependency.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: