[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272069: marked as done (apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:32:49 +0100
with message-id <1253133169.647257.3715.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package apache has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #272069,
regarding apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
272069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272069
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.31-6
Severity: important

#269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not
all www-browser alternatives do support -dump. netrik e.g. does need
--dump. Switching to --dump on the other hand would make w3m getting
problems. I don't know for other browsers that do the www-browser
alternative like (e)links, lynx supports both.

 This needs to be addressed soon and should IMHO definitely go into
sarge. What a clean solution is I don't really now. It would be great if
w3m supports GNU-style options, but I don't think that that is going to
happen soon.

 Thanks for working on it in advance.
Alfie
-- 
Aber der Aufwand Linux zu installieren und vim zu lernen ist *IMMER*
geringer, als Outlook das Schreiben von vernünftigen Mails beizubringen. ;)
                                  -- Jens Benecke [2001-06-02]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.3.34-4.1+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/272069 in Debian BTS
against the package apache. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/418266. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: