Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:49:43 +0200 with message-id <200806182249.43713.sf@sfritsch.de> and subject line Re: Bug#485525: apache2 crashing with SIGBUS has caused the Debian Bug report #485525, regarding apache2 crashing with SIGBUS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 485525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485525 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: apache2 crashing with SIGBUS
- From: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:06:46 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080610020646.GK13389@masters13.cs.jhu.edu>
Subject: apache2: Apache crashing with SIGBUS Package: apache2 Version: 2.2.8-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** While serving requests, Apache worker processes are committing suicide, something like this (taken from the error log): [Mon Jun 09 19:58:43 2008] [notice] Apache/2.2.8 (Debian) mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.8g configured -- resuming normal operations ... [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1817): OpenSSL: read 48/48 bytes from BIO#1d7690 [mem: 234cb5] (BIO dump follows) [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1750): +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1789): | 0000: b3 98 1f b5 cf 43 6a d6-58 22 97 b1 09 31 64 f8 .....Cj.X"...1d. | [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1789): | 0010: b7 41 b4 96 15 5b d5 8b-d4 60 23 f7 95 cc ce c1 .A...[...`#..... | [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1789): | 0020: 32 9d 65 94 f8 10 20 02-36 4a d6 0b 36 32 31 c1 2.e... .6J..621. | [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1795): +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1760): OpenSSL: Loop: SSLv3 read finished A [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1760): OpenSSL: Loop: SSLv3 write change cipher spec A [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1760): OpenSSL: Loop: SSLv3 write finished A [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1760): OpenSSL: Loop: SSLv3 flush data [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(670): inside shmcb_store_session [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(676): session_id[0]=73, masked index=9 [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(1059): entering shmcb_insert_encoded_session, *queue->pos_count = 0 [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(983): entering shmcb_expire_division [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(1115): we have 14386 bytes and 133 indexes free - enough [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [debug] ssl_scache_shmcb.c(1144): storing in index 0, at offset 0 >>>> [Mon Jun 09 21:30:06 2008] [notice] child pid 30461 exit signal Bus error (10) [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1828): OpenSSL: I/O error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#1d7690 [mem: 234cb0] [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [info] [client 128.220.223.61] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed. [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1770): OpenSSL: Write: SSL negotiation finished successfully [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [info] [client 128.220.223.61] Connection closed to child 4 with standard shutdown (server wiki.ietfng.org:443) [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1828): OpenSSL: I/O error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#1d7690 [mem: 234cb0] [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [info] [client 128.220.223.61] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed. [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1770): OpenSSL: Write: SSL negotiation finished successfully [Mon Jun 09 21:30:20 2008] [info] [client 128.220.223.61] Connection closed to child 2 with standard shutdown (server wiki.ietfng.org:443) (The fact that it's SIGBUS rather than SIGSEGV may be because this is 2.6.18, a vserver kernel, on Sparc64 hardware; honestly I'm not sure.) If I can provide any other information, feel free to ask. Thanks for your time. --nwf; -- Package-specific info: List of enabled modules from 'apache2 -M': alias auth_basic authn_file authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_user autoindex cgi dir* env mime negotiation python setenvif ssl status (A * means that the .conf file for that module is not enabled in /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/) -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.16 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages apache2 depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork 2.2.8-4 Traditional model for Apache HTTPD apache2 recommends no packages. -- no debconf informationAttachment: pgp8cP8OtikvV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu>
- Cc: 485525-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#485525: apache2 crashing with SIGBUS
- From: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:49:43 +0200
- Message-id: <200806182249.43713.sf@sfritsch.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080618203148.GQ11025@masters13.cs.jhu.edu>
- References: <[🔎] 20080610020646.GK13389@masters13.cs.jhu.edu> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0806110856330.2929@eru.sfritsch.de> <[🔎] 20080618203148.GQ11025@masters13.cs.jhu.edu>
version: 2.2.9-1 On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, but I rolled back, the bug went away, and then > I got distracted. So yes, the bug did not exhibit itself seemingly > at all on 2.2.8-3. Thanks for checking. It seems gcc does something wrong on sparc with -DFORTIFY_SOURCE. 2.2.9-1 was also compiled without -DFORTIFY_SOURCE, like 2.2.8-3. I will therefore mark the bug as closed in 2.2.9-1. When you upgrade to that version and the problem reappears, please tell me / reopen the bug. Thanks for your help. Cheers, Stefan
--- End Message ---