[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#482270: /usr/bin/apu-config: Missing dependency on libmysqlclient15-dev



Package: libaprutil1-dev
Version: 1.2.12+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/apu-config
Justification: Makes other packages ftbfs

Hi,

the mysql support has recently been enabled in the libapr package.
One of my packages (kdesvn) uses apu-config to determine the linker
flags:
# apu-config --libs --ldflags --link-ld
which now prints
-L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient_r -L/usr/lib -laprutil-1

1.2.12+dfsg-3 had
-L/usr/lib -laprutil-1

So it seems, that libaprutil1-dev should have to add a dependency on
libmysqlclient15-dev. (you can also check /usr/lib/libaprutil-1.la,
which lists mysql under dependency_libs). 

As a consequence, kdesvn currently ftbfs: #482220

Alternatively, disabling mysql support in libaputil would be (my preferred)
alternative.

I don't really want, that the installation of kdesvn pulls in the rather
heavy weith mysql libs.

Cheers,
Michael


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25.4
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libaprutil1-dev depends on:
ii  libapr1-dev                1.2.12-2      The Apache Portable Runtime Librar
ii  libaprutil1                1.2.12+dfsg-4 The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libdb-dev [libdb4.6-dev]   4.6.21-8      Berkeley v4.6 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1-dev              1.95.8-4      XML parsing C library - developmen
ii  libldap2-dev               2.4.7-6.3     OpenLDAP development libraries
ii  libpcre3-dev               7.6-2         Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpq-dev                  8.3.1-2+b1    header files for libpq5 (PostgreSQ
ii  libsqlite3-dev             3.5.9-1       SQLite 3 development files

libaprutil1-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: