[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#450831: apache2-mpm-prefork: apache does not start with: No space left on device: mod_rewrite: could not create rewrite_log_lock error



Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: normal

Today on my box apache was down and did not start any more, this was the error from the logs:

[crit] (28)No space left on device: mod_rewrite: could not create rewrite_log_lock
Configuration Failed

But there was plenty of space on the file system.

After googling around a bit I discovered the problem was in the semaphores and a way to solve the problem is:
ipcs -s | grep www-data | awk ' { print $2 } ' | xargs ipcrm sem

So I suppose there is a memory leak somewhere.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apache2-mpm-prefork depends on:
ii  apache2. 2.2.6-2                         Next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  libapr1  1.2.7-8.2                       The Apache Portable Runtime Librar
ii  libaprut 1.2.7+dfsg-2                    The Apache Portable Runtime Utilit
ii  libc6    2.6.1-1                         GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.4 4.4.20-8                        Berkeley v4.4 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat 1.95.8-3.4                      XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-13.3                     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpcre3 6.7-1                           Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpq5   8.2.4-2                         PostgreSQL C client library
ii  libsqlit 3.4.2-2                         SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libuuid1 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2 universally unique id library

apache2-mpm-prefork recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information




Reply to: