[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274704: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd



Hi,

Here is a now even simpler patch which makes apache build and run fine.
Could you _please_ apply it on next upload? (it basically just _can't_
affect any other archs)

Samuel
diff -urN apache-1.3.34/debian/patches/012_hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream apache-1.3.34-hurd/debian/patches/012_hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream
--- apache-1.3.34/debian/patches/012_hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream	2007-01-17 00:12:39.000000000 +0100
+++ apache-1.3.34-hurd/debian/patches/012_hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream	2007-01-17 00:14:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 diff -ruN -x Makefile.in -x configure -x *~ -x apache_1.3.20.orig apache_1.3.20.orig/src/include/ap_config.h apache_1.3.20/src/include/ap_config.h
 --- build-tree/apache_1.3.34/src/include/ap_config.h	Thu Apr  5 20:13:11 2001
 +++ build-tree/apache_1.3.34/src/include/ap_config.h	Tue Jun 12 12:53:24 2001
-@@ -503,6 +503,13 @@
+@@ -503,6 +503,20 @@
  typedef int rlim_t;
  #endif
  
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@
 +#define HAVE_MMAP 1
 +#define USE_MMAP_FILES 1
 +#define USE_MMAP_SCOREBOARD 1
++#define HAVE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT
++#define HAVE_GMTOFF 1
++#undef NO_KILLPG
++#undef NO_SETSID
++#undef NEED_STRDUP
++#define AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK
++#define NET_SIZE_T socklen_t
 +#include <sys/time.h>
 +
  #elif defined(SCO)
diff -urN apache-1.3.34/debian/patches/022_backtrace_gnukfreebsd apache-1.3.34-hurd/debian/patches/022_backtrace_gnukfreebsd
--- apache-1.3.34/debian/patches/022_backtrace_gnukfreebsd	2007-01-17 00:12:39.000000000 +0100
+++ apache-1.3.34-hurd/debian/patches/022_backtrace_gnukfreebsd	2007-01-16 23:13:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
   */
  
 -#if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)
-+#if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) && !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)
++#if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) && !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) && !defined(__GNU__)
  #error This module is currently only implemented for Linux and FreeBSD.
  #endif
  

Reply to: