[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#396631: Same problem with latest version of apache2/libapr1



* H. S. Teoh (hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx) [061219 06:49]:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:46:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * H. S. Teoh (hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx) [061218 19:39]:
> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [H. S. Teoh]
> > > > > Hi, the old patch (currently in unstable) already works---my test was
> > > > > invalid because I upgraded apache2 but forgot to upgrade libapr1. Do
> > > > > you still want me to test the new patch?
> > > > 
> > > > Ahh - great to hear!  Yes, If it's convenient for you, please do test
> > > > my new patch.  It's a little bit cleaner than the old one, and it does
> > > > fix one bug, unless I'm completely misreading it.
> > > [...
> > > 
> > > Hi, I just tried to build libapr1 with the new patch, but I'm unable to
> > > test it because I'm getting unrelated errors (apache2 doesn't load its
> > > configuration correctly and doesn't start... I don't think this is
> > > related to the patch, probably a build environment problem).
> > 
> > Which architecture do you use?
> [...]
> 
> i686. But it runs on a modified kernel that my colo provider uses for
> running virtual servers. I'm not sure if this makes a difference in the
> build. All I did was `apt-get source libapr1`, copy the new patch into
> debian/patches, and run `dpkg-buildpackage -r fakeroot`.

I uploaded packages for this architecture now on
http://people.debian.org/~aba/apr/ - the changes-file is signed by me so
that you know it was really me.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/



Reply to: