reopen 316321 thanks sorry, i disagree. "reload" should not start a service that is not running. i suppose current policy is a little ambiguous on the issue, but i brought it up on devel some time before raising the severity and the general consensus was in agreement with me. i also supplied a patch which is fairly trivial, so i don't see what the big deal is. sean On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 05:48 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #316321: apache2-common: 'reload' init target should not restart server, > which was filed against the apache2-common package. > > It has been closed by Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> by replying > to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > email message attachment > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> > > To: 316321-done@bugs.debian.org > > Subject: Re: Fixed in 2.0.55-4.2? > > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:24:26 +0200 > > > > Version. 2.0.55-4.2 > > > > * Patrick Winnertz (patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org) [060916 02:24]: > > > I think this bug is at least fixed in 2.0.55-4.2. > > > > > > [...] > > > I think this is a good behaviour of the initscript and think the bug can > > > be closed. > > > > Closing it now. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Andi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part