Your message dated Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:39:41 +0100 with message-id <1163453982.4774.46.camel@darwin.os9.nl> and subject line Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common
- From: Robert Stone <talby@trap.mtview.ca.us>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 09:36:54 -0700
- Message-id: <20050502163654.GA4650@trap.mtview.ca.us>
Package: apache2-common Version: 2.0.54-2 Severity: minor There are a number of Debian and Linux banners that the apache-common package provides that were overlooked by the apache2-common package. I don't really know if they should be provided by this package, but thought it might have been an oversight. This is the list of images: icons/debian/banner_a.gif icons/debian/banner_h.gif icons/debian/banner_h.html icons/debian/banner_v.gif icons/debian/banner_v.html icons/debian/banner_v.jpg icons/debian/button-1.gif icons/debian/openlogo-100.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-25.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-50.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-75.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-nd-100.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-nd-25.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-nd-50.jpg icons/debian/openlogo-nd-75.jpg icons/jhe061.gif icons/linuxins.jpg icons/linux-pengo-small.gif icons/linux-small.jpg icons/logo-sm2.gif icons/penguinlogo1.jpg icons/pp-2.gif
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 307346-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common
- From: Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:39:41 +0100
- Message-id: <1163453982.4774.46.camel@darwin.os9.nl>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061113205313.GA14599@trap.mtview.ca.us>
- References: <[🔎] 1163338932.5324.27.camel@darwin.os9.nl> <[🔎] 20061113205313.GA14599@trap.mtview.ca.us>
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 12:53 -0800, Robert Stone wrote: > That's a perfectly valid response. If a stock apache doesn't > refer to the content, then there isn't a strong reason to make sure > they are available. > Thanks for the update. No problem, closing the bug now. ThijsAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---