[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#364402: marked as done (libapr0: please move its section to libs, instead of net)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:10:49 +0200
with message-id <87k63c4n46.fsf@thosu.err.no>
and subject line Fixed in apr 1.x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.55-4
Severity: wishlist

While "auditing" the installation of my systems, I noticed that libapr0 is packaged
under section net. My naïve impression would be that its proper place would be in
section libs, instead.

I know that changing the section and priority of packages may be troublesome, since
they have to be approved by the ftpmasters, but I just wanted to file this whishlist
bug in case you happen to agree.


Thanks.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc1-5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

libapr0 is deprecated and libapr1 is in libs rather than net, so it
seems your wish has come true.  Closing this bug.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen                                                        ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are      : :' :
                                                                      `. `' 
                                                                        `-

--- End Message ---
Reply to: