[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#368225: marked as done (Wish: Add LAMP metapackage)



Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:41:47 +0200
with message-id <87ejxkri7o.fsf@thosu.err.no>
and subject line Bug#368225: Wish: Add LAMP metapackage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apache
Severity: wishlist

Would it be possible to add a metapackage so that it is easier for a user/web developer to install a stadar LAMP
setup? I'm talking about something similar to apachefriends.org's XAMPP.

Packages included there:
 Apache 2.2.0, MySQL 5.0.20, PHP 5.1.2 & 4.4.2 & PEAR + SQLite 2.8.17/3.2.8 + multibyte (mbstring) support, Perl
 5.8.7, ProFTPD 1.2.10, phpMyAdmin 2.8.0.3, OpenSSL 0.9.8a, GD 2.0.1, Freetype2 2.1.7, libjpeg 6b, libpng 1.2.7,
 gdbm 1.8.0, zlib 1.2.3, expat 1.2, Sablotron 1.0, libxml 2.4.26, Ming 0.2a, Webalizer 2.01, pdf class 009e,
 ncurses 5.8, mod_perl 2.0.1, FreeTDS 0.63, gettext 0.11.5, IMAP C-Client 2004e, OpenLDAP (client) 2.3.11,
 mcrypt 2.5.7, mhash 0.8.18, eAccelerator 0.9.4, cURL 7.13.1, libxslt 1.1.8, phpSQLiteAdmin 0.2, libapreq 2.06-dev,
 FPDF 1.53, XAMPP Control Panel 0.6

More Info: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-linux.html


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Leonidas Arvanitis 

| Would it be possible to add a metapackage so that it is easier for a
| user/web developer to install a stadar LAMP setup? I'm talking about
| something similar to apachefriends.org's XAMPP.

Short answer: no.

Long answer:  This is not something the apache team wants to do.  If
somebody wants to make a package which sets up a LAMP (whether the P
is for perl, python, php or some other language), they're obviously
free to do so.  If so, an RFP (request for packaging) is probably what
you want, not a wishlist bug report against apache.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen                                                        ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are      : :' :
                                                                      `. `' 
                                                                        `-  

--- End Message ---

Reply to: