[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#340770: IndexOptions not being incremental



Package: apache2
Version: 2.0.54-5
Severity: normal

I would like to use the following setup, and I expect it to have FancyIndexing for the current directory, with SuppressDescription and SuppressLastModified
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf:IndexOptions FancyIndexing VersionSort NameWidth=*
../.htaccess:IndexOptions +SuppressDescription
./.htaccess:IndexOptions +SuppressLastModified
But, it doesn't seem to have FancyIndexing on.
Looking at the documentation at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_autoindex.html#indexoptions, I expect to see FancyIndexing with SuppressDescription and SuppressLastModified

Next, I tried removing ./.htaccess, which gave me FancyIndexing for the current directory, with SuppressDescription, as expected.

Next, I tried:
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf:IndexOptions FancyIndexing VersionSort NameWidth=*
../.htaccess:IndexOptions +SuppressDescription
./.htaccess:IndexOptions FancyIndexing +SuppressLastModified
which gives me FancyIndexing, but without SuppressLastModified.
Looking at the documentation at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_autoindex.html#indexoptions, I expect to see FancyIndexing with SuppressLastModified

Next, I tried:
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf:IndexOptions FancyIndexing VersionSort NameWidth=*
../.htaccess:IndexOptions +SuppressDescription
./.htaccess:IndexOptions FancyIndexing SuppressLastModified
which gives me FancyIndexing, with SuppressLastModified, as expected.

Thanks,
Jayen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (980, 'testing'), (960, 'stable'), (930, 'unstable'), (900, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages apache2 depends on:
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork           2.0.54-5   traditional model for Apache2

apache2 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: