[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#288424: Authentikation dosn't work anymore.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: apache
Version: 1.3.33-2
Severity: normal

I have the following configuration (relevant parts)

<Directory /path/to/restrikted/dir>
   DAV on
   AuthGroupFile /path/to/a/dir/group
   AuthUserFile /path/to/a/dir/passwd
   AuthName "My Locked Pages"
   AuthType Basic
   <LimitExcept GET HEAD>
      Require user bla
   </LimitExcept>
</Directory>

The group is empty and the passwd has one entry for the user.

This configuration worked a bit longer time ago.

No I did several updates of apache on this box and the authentication
dosn't work anymore. No other has been changed except the system
updates.

The Error is:
[Mon Jan  3 18:53:44 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(343): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - ap_get_basic_auth_pw failed
[Mon Jan  3 18:53:45 2005] [error] (25)Inappropriate ioctl for device: access to / failed for ikki, reason: Authentication failure
[Mon Jan  3 18:53:45 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(387): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - basic authentication failure
[Mon Jan  3 18:55:40 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(343): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - ap_get_basic_auth_pw failed
[Mon Jan  3 18:55:43 2005] [error] (25)Inappropriate ioctl for device: access to / failed for ikki, reason: Authentication failure
[Mon Jan  3 18:55:43 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(387): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - basic authentication failure
[Mon Jan  3 18:56:40 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(343): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - ap_get_basic_auth_pw failed
[Mon Jan  3 18:56:42 2005] [error] (25)Inappropriate ioctl for device: access to / failed for ikki, reason: Authentication failure
[Mon Jan  3 18:56:42 2005] [debug] mod_auth_pam.c(387): [client 192.168.17.4] pam_auth_basic_user() - basic authentication failure

I never configured pam authentikation in apache (Well I never know that
and how this can be done..).

So apache should use his common authentication and not pam!

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (70, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE)

Versions of packages apache depends on:
ii  apache-common               1.3.33-2     Support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf                     1.4.30.10    Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                        1.10.25      Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-17    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.8-1     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libmagic1                   4.12-1       File type determination library us
ii  logrotate                   3.7-2        Log rotation utility
ii  mime-support                3.28-1       MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                        5.8.4-3      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

- -- debconf information:
* apache/enable-suexec: false
* apache/server-name: hathi.ket
* apache/document-root: /home/www
* apache/server-port: 80
* apache/init: true
* apache/server-admin: Klaus@Ethgen.de
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen                            http://www.ethgen.de/
pub  2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE  EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQdmLwZ+OKpjRpO3lAQLmbAf/Scdd3Ow0Qjsk/T9OiNzLVAsZlTU0/xEd
qIDhck/tLv5AUeRyBrt2MN0oOc2IWm/m0fXlQcjPf9OIMwt1Pf5puPgxVjOUJZ5q
Z9vlYg3/QjH8Zv3rSaiC38c0QRbb4rQzQqha9i+sBTCWcjFbstAeY+nahYgZ/k7q
hhj0ju1+pzg7kTV0MwmEnj0ivCpJxhAp33CzYY6sVKYt3WTpGG11aQ+Dqg4u8JCV
ROWw46mgCiTDxq87VbRADMgETzFBvULz7c2QrA+zAmxqRANHVyjVZY7Hc6bpGafx
J0FkN3ykDcBSiU1epqwrAr68VGr5cvx7tTNA7QLuZERyH3s886m9Mw==
=GNpI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: