[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#229677: marked as done (apache2-common: segfault-o-rama with ldap auth)



Your message dated Sun, 9 May 2004 13:20:40 +0100
with message-id <20040509122040.GA6280@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
and subject line These two look identical.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2004 23:35:08 +0000
>From wichert@ams.attingo.nl Sun Jan 25 15:35:08 2004
Return-path: <wichert@ams.attingo.nl>
Received: from random.ams.attingo.nl (smtp.ams.attingo.nl) [212.123.202.80] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AktmW-00084Q-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:35:08 -0800
Received: from wichert by smtp.ams.attingo.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AktmU-0007x6-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:35:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache2-common: segfault-o-rama with ldap auth
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:35:06 +0100
Message-Id: <E1AktmU-0007x6-00@smtp.ams.attingo.nl>
Sender: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@ams.attingo.nl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.0.47-1
Severity: critical

As soon as I enable LDAP authentication on a vhost apache2 will segfault
on pretty much all hits. The LDAP config is trivial:

       <Location />
               AuthName        "Attingo Staff Portal"
               AuthType        Basic
               AuthLDAPEnabled on
               AuthLdapURL
               ldap://vortex:389/ou=People,dc=attingo,dc=nl?uid?sub
               Require         valid-user
       </Location>

Wichert.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux random 2.4.22exec-shield #1 Tue Nov 25 23:26:51 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages apache2-common depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.3.22       Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                 2.6.2        Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libapr0                     2.0.48-4     The Apache Portable Runtime
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.1                    4.1.25-16    Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.6-6     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libldap2                    2.1.23-1     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7c-5     SSL shared libraries
ii  mime-support                3.24-1       MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  net-tools                   1.60-9       The NET-3 networking toolkit
ii  openssl                     0.9.7c-5     Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 12:15:25 +0000
>From thom@debian.org Sun May 09 05:15:25 2004
Return-path: <thom@debian.org>
Received: from (amnesiac.heapspace.net) [195.54.228.42] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMnDJ-0000zj-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 05:15:25 -0700
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by inject (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 94D7257DF; Sun,  9 May 2004 13:15:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (dev.bitch-whore.com [213.208.111.147])
	by amnesiac.heapspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F156F57C2; Sun,  9 May 2004 13:15:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: by fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C77CB17745B; Sun,  9 May 2004 13:20:40 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:20:40 +0100
From: Thom May <thom@debian.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 202452-done@bugs.debian.org, 229677-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: These two look identical.
Message-ID: <20040509122040.GA6280@fugue.home.clearairturbulence.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 202452-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

severity 202452 important
merge 202452 229677
thanks

With no further information and no-one able to reproduce these bugs, I'm
gonna close them.

--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
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=T5iX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--



Reply to: