[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#266165: marked as done (new version causes Subversion to segfault)



Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:03:25 -0700
with message-id <20040818000325.GA1533@catalunya>
and subject line Bug#266330: Acknowledgement (subversion: svn complains about broken UTF8 and cannot update or export anymore)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 22:39:51 +0000
>From joshk@rackable.com Mon Aug 16 15:39:51 2004
Return-path: <joshk@rackable.com>
Received: from 64-60-248-69.cust.telepacific.net (mx.rackable.com) [64.60.248.69] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bwq8t-0004fm-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:39:51 -0700
Received: from vindicate.triplehelix.org ([10.201.10.53]) by mx.rackable.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:37:46 -0700
Received: from joshk by vindicate.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bwq8O-0001mO-On; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:39:20 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: new version causes Subversion to segfault
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:39:20 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Bwq8O-0001mO-On@vindicate.triplehelix.org>
Sender: Joshua Kwan <joshk@rackable.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2004 22:37:46.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6EAEA30:01C483E1]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.50-9
Severity: serious

libapr0 2.0.50-9 has a great side effect of causing Subversion 1.0.6-1
to segfault. Reverting to 2.0.50-8 works. I figure this change in -9 did
it:

  * Bump libapr0 shlibs to (>= 2.0.50-9), since we're introducing
    some serious ABI breakage with the above changes.
      
Could you at least bump the soname, and provide a compat wrapper for
some functions? Or perhaps forcing a Subversion rebuild with latest APR
is better. (And all the other separate SVN stuff that links to APR as
well.) I can't really figure out which solution is best.

-Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages libapr0 depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-16    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.6-8     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libpcre3                    4.5-1.1      Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266330-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 00:03:10 +0000
>From kraai@ftbfs.org Tue Aug 17 17:03:10 2004
Return-path: <kraai@ftbfs.org>
Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BxDv4-0005KW-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:03:10 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-195-189.rev.o1.com [66.81.195.189])
	by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i7I0384Y079102
	for <266330-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kraai@ftbfs.org)
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BxDvJ-0000QN-E5
	for 266330-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:03:25 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:03:25 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
To: 266330-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#266330: Acknowledgement (subversion: svn complains about broken UTF8 and cannot update or export anymore)
Message-ID: <20040818000325.GA1533@catalunya>
References: <E1Bx5SD-0000ew-L5@localhost.localdomain> <handler.266330.B.1092755287998.ack@bugs.debian.org> <1092756776.4135.44.camel@ganymede.kk.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1092756776.4135.44.camel@ganymede.kk.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c
	on zoon.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: 266330-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> i had thought as i was using svn+ssh that libapr0 wouldn't matter. Yet
> downgrading libapr0 to 2.0.50-8 fixed the problem. Apparently libapr0 is
> also involved in svn: and svn+ssh: transfers for some reason.

The incompatibility with libapr0 2.0.50-9 is fixed in subversion
1.0.6-1.1.

--=20
Matt Kraai            kraai@ftbfs.org            http://ftbfs.org/

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFBIpzNfNdgYxVXvBARAp9tAJ9zw5Xst764lpTxmyC/GORrDnPycwCY6C3A
8eQ1r+q0sOr0trjBWg4dGA==
=QRfc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--



Reply to: