[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#214541: marked as done (apache-common: Apache should ASK whether to use debconf)



Your message dated Mon, 29 Mar 2004 04:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403290408350.26053@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
and subject line Bug#214541: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2003 10:04:04 +0000
>From thomas@88.net Tue Oct 07 05:04:04 2003
Return-path: <thomas@88.net>
Received: from 82-35-42-29.cable.ubr02.camd.blueyonder.co.uk (o9.88.net) [82.35.42.29] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A6ohH-0005j2-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:04:04 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by o9.88.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7B1C214315E; Tue,  7 Oct 2003 11:04:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from o9.88.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (o9.88.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 16507-07; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:04:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: by o9.88.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 25E73143117; Tue,  7 Oct 2003 11:04:01 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: thomas lakofski <thomas@88.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache-common: Apache should ASK whether to use debconf
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.33
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:04:01 +0100
Message-Id: <20031007100401.25E73143117@o9.88.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at 88.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: apache-common
Version: 1.3.28-1
Severity: normal

Won't address all the other breakage in this new version in this bug
report.  Could we have an initial option of whether to configure apache
with debconf at all?  Or maybe just restrict it to control of which dso
modules are loaded?

cheers,

-thomas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux o9.88.net 2.4.22 #1 Fri Oct 3 15:58:08 BST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages apache-common depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.3.14     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.1                      4.1.25-9   Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                     1.95.6-6   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  mime-support                  3.23-1     MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl [perl5]                  5.8.1-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214541-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2004 02:10:33 +0000
>From fabbione@fabbione.net Sun Mar 28 18:10:33 2004
Return-path: <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [212.242.169.198] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B7mET-00061w-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:10:33 -0800
Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.169.198])
	by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F30016; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 04:10:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 04:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Sender: fabbione@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net
To: Thomas Lakofski <thomas@88.net>
Cc: 214541-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#214541: (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403282231450.17700@o9>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403290408350.26053@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403282237120.26053@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403282231450.17700@o9>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 214541-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Thomas Lakofski wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> > 	I think this bug is somehow not valid anymore. Now all the
> > scripts are working as they should and user configuration changes are
> > preserved.
> >
> > Since asking to use or not debconf isn't an option do you see any reason
> > to keep this bug open?
>
> Sounds fair to me -- just as long as it doesn't break httpd.conf too
> often in the future...

No there will be no more break. We are actually working on auditing all
external packages to try to achive a certain consistency in managing the
configurations and preserving users settings but it's a long work that we
hope to complete asap.

Thanks
Fabio

-- 
<user> fajita: step one
<fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
<user> fajita: step two
<fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.



Reply to: