Re: Apache module Loading problem
Hi Cemil,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Cemil Degirmenci wrote:
> A long time the missing info files was no problem, because Apache starts anyway... but after doing some
> handicrafts it seems that i destroy my Apache. After /etc/init.apache start now the following Error appears:
> <snip>[Tue Jan 13 15:36:23 2004] [warn] module setenvif_module is already loaded, skipping
> [Tue Jan 13 15:36:23 2004] [warn] module perl_module is already loaded, skipping
> [Tue Jan 13 15:36:23 2004] [warn] module php4_module is already loaded, skipping
> Syntax error on line 370 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
> Invalid command 'Order', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration
>
> /var/log/apache/error.log doesnt say something usefull, even in debug mode :/
> www:/etc/apache# tail -f /var/log/apache/error.log
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:47 2004] [info] SQLInclude: Config specifies User@Server:Port = benny@192.168.0.200:3306
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:47 2004] [info] SQLInclude: Connection to '192.168.0.200' established...
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:47 2004] [info] SQLInclude: SQL query successed: 801 rows fetched
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:47 2004] [info] SQLInclude: Done.
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:47 2004] [info] mod_unique_id: using ip addr 127.0.0.1
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:48 2004] [notice] Apache/1.3.29 (Debian GNU/Linux) mod_accounting/0.5 PHP/4.3.3 configured -- resuming normal operations
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:48 2004] [info] Server built: Dec 17 2003 15:54:05
> [Tue Jan 13 14:48:48 2004] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
> [Tue Jan 13 14:51:40 2004] [info] removed PID file /var/run/apache.pid (pid=6942)
> [Tue Jan 13 14:51:40 2004] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
>
After we talked on irc and we fixed the .info problems, did you manage to
find the other problem for the multiple loadmodules and the "Order"
missing?
Fabio
PS sorry but it took me more than 2 hours to come back home
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
Reply to: