On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:47:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > I'm not sure I love the /debian-www/ bit; it's a bit aesthetically > > displeasing, but to each their own. Good idea otherwise, however. > > I agree, it is not the prettiest name. I considered just /debian/, but > it seemed more likely that would conflict with something on someone's > web server. > > Do note that there is nothing stopping an admin from linking /foo/ to > /debian-www/. They'll have to keep /debian-www/ around because of links > that will refer to it, Not with a little mod_rewrite. Or even a 302 redirect. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature