Bug#50420: marked as done (simple CGI-script explodes?)
Your message dated 15 Jul 2003 19:52:28 +0200
with message-id <87r84r65k3.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
and subject line unreproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 1999 08:22:58 +0000
Received: (qmail 31803 invoked from network); 17 Nov 1999 08:22:57 -0000
Received: from mailgate.dave.sonera.fi (194.137.238.131)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 1999 08:22:57 -0000
Received: from smtp.dave.sonera.fi (smtp.dave.sonera.fi [131.177.216.195])
by mailgate.dave.sonera.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA10944
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:22:30 +0200 (EET)
Received: from stenbma2-pc.ete.tele.fi (stenbma2-pc.ete.tele.fi [131.177.253.34])
by smtp.dave.sonera.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA12631
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:22:33 +0200 (EET)
Received: (qmail 22451 invoked by uid 18506); 17 Nov 1999 08:22:27 -0000
Sender: fingon@dreamland.nowhere
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: simple CGI-script explodes?
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@abacus-solutions.com>
Date: 17 Nov 1999 10:22:27 +0200
Message-ID: <lpxiu31h6ik.fsf@dreamland.nowhere>
Lines: 84
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.9-10
Severity: normal
I accidentally filed this bug against the libapache-mod-python
initially. Basic idea is, my CGI scripts, of any type, cause the
Apache package to go up in flames.
Snippage from the libapache-mod-python mail:
>The module seems to be moderately useless on my potato-latest
>system. It seems to work fine, except roughly once every 40 requests
>the apache child process running Python request simply segfaults.
>
>Example log snippet:
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:42 1999] [notice] child pid 16322 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:36 1999] [notice] child pid 16317 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:37 1999] [notice] child pid 16318 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:40 1999] [notice] child pid 16320 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:40 1999] [notice] child pid 16319 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>[Wed Nov 17 09:37:42 1999] [notice] child pid 16321 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
>
>Script being run (as stress test; two clients spamming the server with requests):
>##################################################################################
>#!/usr/bin/env python
># -*-Python-*-
>#
># $Id: test.py $
>#
># Author: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@abacus-solutions.com>
>#
># Created: Wed Nov 17 09:26:34 1999 fingon
># Last modified: Wed Nov 17 09:43:35 1999 fingon
>#
>"""
>
>"""
>
>#import cgi
>
>print "Content-type: text/html" # HTML is following
>print # blank line, end of headers
>
>print "Hello, World!\n"
>##################################################################################
>
It seems that following cgi is enough to cause the problem:
#!/bin/ash
#-*-ksh-*-
#
# $Id: test.sh $
#
# Author: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@abacus-solutions.com>
#
# Created: Wed Nov 17 10:14:46 1999 fingon
# Last modified: Wed Nov 17 10:15:17 1999 fingon
#
echo "Content-type: text/html"
echo
echo "Hello, World!"
Apache packages installed:
ii apache 1.3.9-10 Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii apache-common 1.3.9-10 Support files for all Apache webservers
ii libapache-mod-p 4.19-1 Embedding Python in the Apache web server
ii libapache-mod-s 2.4.2-1.3.9-1 Strong cryptography for Apache
ii libapache-mod-s 2.4.2-1.3.9-1 Documentation for Apache module mod_ssl
Configuration is almost out-of-the-box, with cgi_script mapped to .cgi. The
test.{sh,py} are symlinked to test.cgi for cgi_script testing
purposes.
test.py was used to crash the libapache-mod-python.
Linux dreamland.nowhere 2.2.13ac3-reiserfs #14 Wed Nov 10 14:37:26 EET 1999 i686 unknown
System is potato-latest, as of today. Start time of the problem is unknown.
--
Markus Stenberg
Finger fingon@mpoli.fi for my PGP public key
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 50420-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2003 17:52:39 +0000
>From tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no Tue Jul 15 12:52:32 2003
Return-path: <tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no>
Received: from vawad.samfundet.no [129.241.93.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cTyY-0003RS-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:52:30 -0500
Received: from yiwaz.raw.no (s135.ifi.uio.no [129.240.72.135])
by vawad.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6FE29A86
for <50420-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by yiwaz.raw.no (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0B56D9659F; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no
Original-Sender: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
X-URL: http://raw.no/
To: 50420-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: unreproducible
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
Date: 15 Jul 2003 19:52:28 +0200
Message-ID: <87r84r65k3.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 50420-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This bug is not present in the current unstable version, it seems, so
I'm just closing this bug.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: