Re: virtual hosts
Thom May <thom@debian.org> writes:
> Urm, gosh. I hate it when I typo that bad. I meant, of course, "not
> against this". Sorry :-)
Ah, I kind of hoped it was a typo, from the context, but didn't want
to make any assumptions.
> > The problem I foresee is that people see something called
> > 'default', and in many cases ('default' sorts pretty early) it
> > will work, but then occassionally it won't, and they'll get
> > confused.
> yup, agreed. I'll just move it to 00default.
How about just Include'ing it first? When thinking more about
things... you *could* have a hostname like 007bondfan.com or
something, so giving 'default' its own include would remove any
doubts.
> > Also, IMO, there is enough 'architecture' in the config directory
> > that a short README would be in order. I can try and put
> > something together if that would be helpful.
> It would be extremely helpful; it's something I keep meaning to do.
> Apologies for the miss-fire above ;-)
Added to the TODO list...
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Reply to: