[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Proposed apache policy.

> As with the Perl upgrades, having 'apache1.3' and 'apache2.0' packages
> which conflict with one another (or maybe not) while providing the
> 'apache' pseudo-package may be the way to go for woody++.  Or I might be
> the only one who likes that methodology and the rest of the world hates
> it?  ;)  (Remembering the autoconf upgrade...)

That seems the best way to me - allows a sysadmin to make the choice if she
feels the need, whilst those that are happy to follow the maintainers
recommendations will get updated automatically.

The perl upgrade went smoothly - so there's no reason why the apache upgrade


Reply to: