RE: Proposed apache policy.
> As with the Perl upgrades, having 'apache1.3' and 'apache2.0' packages
> which conflict with one another (or maybe not) while providing the
> 'apache' pseudo-package may be the way to go for woody++. Or I might be
> the only one who likes that methodology and the rest of the world hates
> it? ;) (Remembering the autoconf upgrade...)
That seems the best way to me - allows a sysadmin to make the choice if she
feels the need, whilst those that are happy to follow the maintainers
recommendations will get updated automatically.
The perl upgrade went smoothly - so there's no reason why the apache upgrade
can't!
Carl
Reply to: