Re: dpkg FTBFS on ports (hurd, x32) with outdated sqv
Guillem Jover, le lun. 19 mai 2025 10:20:06 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 2025-05-19 at 10:03:02 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 19 mai 2025 09:58:07 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > If getting a new sqv version built is going to be too hard or time
> > > > consuming for now, then perhaps removing the sqv binary packages from
> > > > the port (like it's the state for several other ports) is the quickest
> > > > fix to be able to build dpkg, as I mentioned in my original mail.
> > >
> > > Well, this is something Aurelien has to do. I don't have any access to
> > > the Ports FTP servers, so I can't just easily remove packages, unfortunately.
> >
> > On hurd-any at least, apt currently depends on sqv, so removing sqv
> > would make apt uninstallable.
>
> Yes, as mentioned on my original mail, going this route might require
> rebuilding apt.
But better rebuild apt first? Otherwise in the meanwhile the whole
distrib becomes uninstallable and nothing will build, we cannot recreate
chroots, etc.
(and I'd have to see how to do that rebuild, since to avoid sqv
installed for apt not to pick it up, that'd mean removing the apt
package in the build chroot...)
Samuel
Reply to: