[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

make-kpkg fails writing to weird directories on dual or multi core processors

Hi I have using make-kpkg successfully on my amd64 dual core system until about a month ago.

I did the following:
installed debian testing amd64
apt-get install kernel-package make g++ gcc build-essentail libncurses5-dev linux-source-2.6.32

and any other files I needed to build a kernel

I invoked make-kpkg
make-kpkg --initrd --revision custom1.0 --append-to-version custom1.0 kernel_image kernel_headers

( I did not set the CONCURRENCY_LEVEL although I did try it with values 2 and 3 and I still get the same error below)
The compile is fine until the package building starts. Check the errors below, where does the "-live1.0" come from?
I did not type this in. I have tried uninstalling all the packages and reinstalling them, using standard kernels to boot from and custom kernels but nothing works.

However it works fine on my laptop which has a centrino 1.5GHz single cpu.
I also tried kernel-package version 12.033, 12.032 and the one that came with lenny. Problem remains the same.

exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk debian DEBIAN_REVISION=custom1.0  APPEND_TO_VERSION=custom1.0  V=1  INITRD=YES
====== making target debian/stamp/conf/minimal_debian [new prereqs: ]======
This is kernel package version .
test -d debian             || mkdir debian
test ! -e stamp-building || rm -f stamp-building
WARNING: Couldn't open directory /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0: No such file or directory
FATAL: Could not open /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0/modules.dep.temp for writing: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [_modinst_post] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/linux/src/linux-source-2.6.26'
make[1]: *** [debian/stamp/install/linux-image-] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/linux/src/linux-source-2.6.26'
make: *** [kernel_image] Error 2

Any help would be appreciated.
  Rob Key

Reply to: