Re: SCSI Device Addresses
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: SCSI Device Addresses
- From: "Damon L. Chesser" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:46:54 -0500
- Message-id: <47C9887E.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20080229185953.GS1287@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- References: <email@example.com> <20080229140911.GN23076@casco.aei.mpg.de> <1204303886.9406.4.camel@localhost> <20080229170149.GQ1287@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20080229180456.GR1287@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20080229185425.GA7232@titan.hooton> <20080229185953.GS1287@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Is there any advantage of using UUID (which are very long) and a
filesystem label (e.g. LABEL=root) which is shorter and more intuitive?
If you ever have to deal with a disk from another system using labels
you can get into conflicts like trying to deal with two disks with a
label of ROOT. Gets quite annoying. I like to know that MY root disk
will mount because it has the right UUID not because I label it ROOT.
And labels were broken when I switched in the initrd I was trying to use
while UUIDs worked so that's what I stuck with.
How do you determine the UUID?
Damon L. Chesser