[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Broadcom



            hey, when i repeat the operation now i get the following:
debian:~# apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64/etch-backports
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
debian:~# apt-get install linux-image-amd64/etch-backports
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Selected version 2.6.21+8~bpo.1 (Backports.org archive:etch-backports) for linux-image-amd64
linux-image-amd64 is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

But when i check /boot all i see is a deb package: initrd.img-2.6.18-4-amd64, vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-amd64 , a text file

config-2.6.18-4-amd64 and System.map-2.6.18-4-amd64. i assume removing anything would cause a crash right? Can config be edited? uname -r still gives 2.6.18-4-amd64. Grub just offers a choice of single user mode and regular login both with the old kernel. Can the kernel be downloaded in an ordinary manner? Sorry for bugging you all this time. thanks very much for the help.

                            Sincerely,
                            Cavan




On 7/7/07, Cavan Mejias < cavanmejias@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok im using Grub. Ill give it a try.

                 Cavan
 
On 7/7/07, Barak A. Pearlmutter < barak@cs.nuim.ie> wrote:
> Dear Barak,   should uname -r after reboot show:   2.6.18-4-amd64? thats

No.  You should be running 2.6.21, although 2.6.18 should still be
available.

Check in the directory /boot to be sure the 2.6.21 kernel is
installed.

(a) If not, try again using the command line:

  apt-get install linux-image-amd64/etch-backports

(b) If it was, then for some reason the system booted into the
incorrect available kernel.  Assuming you are using "grub", which by
default you will be, when the machine boots up you have a brief window
to choose which kernel of the available kernels it will use.

                                       --Barak.



Reply to: